Was reading some comments about a game which is in a testing phase at the moment and people were of course commenting on the footage and when people mentioned negative's the response was "its a test/early version"
But that got me thinking if a game is released either in a beta/alpha/demo/test release how often are they different to the final product ?.And for me personally with the limited games i have played i have not played many early versions which does not give me a basis on what the final game will be like. The only game i remember playing was timeshift for the pc when i played the demo the game was took back into development and redone so the final version was very different.
There have been games such as killer instinct and streetfighter x tekken were the first vids i saw the game was changed a fair bit though i suspect even with those early versions you would still get a feel of a game.
And of course we have games like duke nukem forever and aliens colonial marines where the final version is different.
But i would really love to know for the people who play far more games then i would what games have you played where the final version was a lot different ?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2014
(67)
-
▼
October
(16)
- Halloween the only time of the year
- What would put you off a game that is announced ?
- Project nimbus kickstarter some early impressions ...
- The return of the space sim
- Secrets in games
- Kingdom come: Deliverance alpha
- Does practice always make perfect ?
- The lessons to be learned from the failed Kickstar...
- Can too much challenge take the fun out of a game ?
- Publisher NDA's and embargo's
- Resolution and frame rates
- Developer feedback done right
- The waiting game
- RTS games with the emphasis on the Strategy part
- Developers that listen to there fans
- early version compared with full release
-
▼
October
(16)
No comments:
Post a Comment